Smiley v. Schultz

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopts in full the magistrate judge’s March 5, 2025 findings and recommendations in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The court denies the plaintiff’s motion to reopen and directs the Clerk to administratively terminate the pending motion for a temporary restraining order.

Holdings

1. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full.
2. Plaintiff's October 23, 2024 motion to reopen was denied.
3. The Clerk was directed to administratively terminate plaintiff's pending motion for a temporary restraining order.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted when no party filed objections.
2. Whether plaintiff's motion to reopen should be denied.
3. Whether the pending motion for a temporary restraining order should be administratively terminated.

Disposition

other