Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California addresses a California prisoner’s requests to stay his habeas corpus proceedings under Kelly v. Small and Rhines v. Weber. The court recommends granting a Kelly stay, denying the Rhines request as moot, and proceeds on the amended petition.
Holdings
- The original petition should be dismissed, and the action should proceed on the amended petition filed April 11, 2025.
- A stay under Kelly v. Small should be granted while petitioner exhausts state-court remedies with respect to claims not appearing in the amended petition.
- The request for a Rhines stay should be denied as moot because the amended petition contained no unexhausted claims.
Questions Presented
- Whether the original habeas petition should be dismissed after petitioner filed an amended petition.
- Whether petitioner was entitled to a stay under Kelly v. Small while exhausting state-court remedies for claims omitted from the amended petition.
- Whether petitioner was entitled to a stay under Rhines v. Weber when the amended petition contained no unexhausted claims.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003)(applied)
- Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005)(applied)
- Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…