Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Plaintiff Susan Marie Kuhn’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) after remanding her Social Security benefits case and her subsequent award of past-due benefits. The court awarded counsel $29,075 and directed counsel to remit $7,100 in previously received EAJA fees to Plaintiff.
Holdings
- The requested $29,075 fee was reasonable and could be awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), notwithstanding that it represented the statutory maximum of 25% of Plaintiff's past-due benefits.
- Counsel was required to remit the previously awarded $7,100 in EAJA fees to Plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b) fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested $29,075 contingent fee, equal to 25% of Plaintiff's past-due benefits, was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
- Whether counsel was required to offset or remit to Plaintiff the $7,100 in EAJA fees previously awarded.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1147, 1149, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 793, 796, 802, 807-09 (2002)(followed)
- Parrish v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1217 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Costa v. Commissioner, 690 F.3d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Garcia v. O'Malley, 2024 WL 4121872 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2024)(considered)
- Guzman Paz v. Commissioner, 2024 WL 4029592 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2024)(considered)
- Garcia v. Commissioner, 2024 WL 3968083 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2024)(considered)
- Roxsann D. A. v. O'Malley, 2024 WL 1136398 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024)(considered)
- Timothy M. v. Commissioner, 2023 WL 1071604 (D. Or. Jan. 27, 2023)(considered)
- Tristan v. Commissioner, 2023 WL 6129832 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 19, 2023)(considered)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…