Taylor Smart and Michael Hacker v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

Smart · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 28, 2025 · No. 2:22-cv-02125 WBS CSK

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants plaintiffs’ request to seal the settlement agreement’s threshold percentage of opt-outs that would trigger its termination clause. The court finds compelling reasons to seal the information because disclosure could invite abuse by professional objectors, and orders defendants to file the unredacted settlement agreement under seal within five days.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiffs established compelling reasons to seal the settlement agreement's opt-out termination threshold because the number was likely not important to individual class members' decisions whether to remain in or opt out of the class, while public disclosure created a potential for abuse by professional objectors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiffs demonstrated compelling reasons sufficient to overcome the strong presumption of public access to judicial records and justify sealing the settlement agreement's opt-out termination threshold.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Friedman v. Guthy-Renker, LLC, No. 2:14-cv-06009 ODW AGR, 2016 WL 5402170, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 26, 2016)(relied upon)
  • In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 19-CV-02690 HSG, 2023 WL 2960006, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2023)(relied upon)
  • In re Yahoo! Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 17-cv-00373-LHK, 2018 WL 11349976, at *2 (N.D. Cal. May 9, 2018)(relied upon)
  • Thomas v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp., No. 14-cv-01160 JST, 2016 WL 3879193, at *7 (N.D. Cal. July 18, 2016)(relied upon)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…