Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California screens a state prisoner’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint concerning opened legal mail, threatened disciplinary proceedings, and confiscated food. Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney recommends dismissal for failure to state a claim and closure of the case, finding that a further opportunity to amend would be futile.
Holdings
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and should be dismissed under the prisoner-screening statute.
- The allegations did not approach a violation of the Eighth Amendment because the alleged de minimis harms were not constitutionally actionable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended prisoner complaint stated a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Whether the allegations concerning prison conditions and conduct by prison officials stated an Eighth Amendment claim.
- Whether plaintiff should be granted another opportunity to amend after the original complaint had already been dismissed with leave to amend.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 349 (1981)(followed)
- McKune v. Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 41 (2002)(followed)
- Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…