Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. The court denied without prejudice Plaintiff Terrence Brewer’s motion for injunctive relief and referred the matter back to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings.
Holdings
- The district court presumes the magistrate judge's factual findings are correct and reviews the magistrate judge's legal conclusions de novo.
- The magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations were adopted.
- The motion for injunctive relief was denied without prejudice to renewal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted after plaintiff's objections.
- Whether plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief should be granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…