Summary
The court recommends granting the plaintiff’s motion to remand after the operative amended complaint removed the only federal cause of action and left only state-law claims. The order also denies as moot the defendants’ request for clarification regarding screening and directs assignment to a district judge.
Holdings
- The court concluded that deletion of the only federal cause of action caused the federal court to lose supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, warranting remand to state court.
- The magistrate judge recommended that plaintiff’s motion to remand be granted and that the case be remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the case should be remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court after plaintiff deleted the only federal cause of action from the operative amended complaint.
- Whether the federal court retained supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22 (2025)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…