Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California reviewed a Social Security disability benefits decision involving right ulnar neuropathy. The court held that the Administrative Law Judge failed to determine whether the neuropathy was a severe impairment and failed to adequately account for it in the residual functional capacity assessment. The Commissioner’s decision was reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings.
Holdings
- The medical evidence established that Plaintiff had a medically determinable impairment of right ulnar neuropathy before the ALJ hearing.
- The ALJ committed reversible error by failing to consider whether right ulnar neuropathy was a severe impairment at step two and by failing to consider the impairment at subsequent steps, including whether it affected the listings analysis and the RFC.
- Remand for further administrative proceedings, rather than immediate payment of benefits, was appropriate.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ erred by failing to determine at step two whether Plaintiff's medically determinable right ulnar neuropathy was a severe impairment.
- Whether the ALJ adequately considered right ulnar neuropathy at subsequent steps, including the listings analysis and residual functional capacity assessment.
- Whether the case should be remanded for immediate payment of benefits or for further administrative proceedings.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (11)
- Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401-02 (1971)(followed)
- Sorenson v. Weinberger, 514 F.2d 1112, 1119 n.10 (9th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Robbins v. Social Security Administration, 466 F.3d 880, 883 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Poliakov v. King, 2025 WL 457097, at *1 (9th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1290 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Yuckert v. Bowen, 841 F.2d 303, 306 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Webb v. Barnhart, 433 F.3d 683, 686-87 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Lewis v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 909, 911 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1020-21 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…