Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Plaintiff Tyonna Turner’s motion to remand a wage-and-hour class action removed under the Class Action Fairness Act. The court held that Defendant established by a preponderance of the evidence that the waiting-time-penalties claim alone placed more than $5 million in controversy.
Holdings
- Defendant established by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million because its waiting-time-penalty calculation alone totaled $5,100,480.
- Separate calculations for overtime, sick pay, meal and rest periods, and reimbursement claims were unnecessary because the waiting-time-penalty claim alone placed more than $5 million in controversy.
- The court did not need to decide whether attorneys' fees could be calculated from the waiting-time-penalty claim because the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million without including attorneys' fees.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant established by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million for CAFA jurisdiction.
- Whether Defendant's evidence and assumptions supported an amount-in-controversy calculation based on maximum waiting-time penalties for the putative class.
- Whether the absence of separate calculations for certain wage claims and attorneys' fees required remand.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (14)
- Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc., 775 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 2015)(distinguished)
- Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81 (2014)(followed)
- Hender v. American Directions Workforce LLC, No. 2:19-cv-01951-KJM-DMC, 2020 WL 5959908, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2020)(followed)
- Avila v. Rue21, Inc., 432 F. Supp. 3d 1175, 1186 (E.D. Cal. 2020)(followed)
- Andrade v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., No. CV 19-06963-CJC(RAOx), 2019 WL 4855997, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2019)(followed)
- Vigil v. DAK Resources, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00163-TLN-AC, 2023 WL 5917522 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 11, 2023)(followed)
- Nunes v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 2:19-cv-01207-JAM-DB, 2019 WL 4316903, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 12, 2019)(followed)
- Garibay v. Archstone Communities, LLC, 539 F. App'x 736, 764 (9th Cir. 2013)(distinguished)
- Sanchez v. Abbott Laboratories, No. 2:20-cv-01436-TLN-AC, 2021 WL 2679057, at *3 (E.D. Cal. June 30, 2021)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…