Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California reviewed the denial of Jose Urzua’s application for Social Security disability insurance benefits. The court held that the administrative law judge failed to adequately account for limitations associated with ulcerative colitis, including frequent bathroom breaks, fecal urgency, and accidents, in determining residual functional capacity. The court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denied the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Holdings
- The ALJ did not err by omitting additional mental limitations from the RFC because the ALJ adequately considered the mild mental findings and substantial evidence supported the resulting mental RFC.
- The ALJ erred by failing to substantively consider the functional effects of ulcerative colitis, including frequent bathroom breaks, fecal urgency, and occasional accidents, in formulating the RFC.
- Remand for further administrative proceedings was appropriate because the record left open whether Urzua was disabled during the relevant period.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ erred by failing to translate assessed mild mental limitations into the residual functional capacity.
- Whether the ALJ adequately considered the evidence of ulcerative colitis and associated bathroom-related limitations when formulating the physical residual functional capacity for the relevant period.
- Whether remand for further administrative proceedings or an award of benefits was appropriate.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (25)
- Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42, 146 n.5 (1987)(followed)
- Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 828 n.5 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Schneider v. Commissioner of the SSA, 223 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Morgan v. Commissioner of the SSA, 169 F.3d 595, 599 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Miller v. Heckler, 770 F.2d 845, 847 (9th Cir. 1985)(followed)
- Saelee v. Chater, 94 F.3d 520, 521 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)(followed)
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)(followed)
- Edlund v. Massanari, 253 F.3d 1152, 1156 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 25.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.