Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as moot. The petition became moot after the petitioner was removed from the United States; the court terminated the respondent’s motion to dismiss and directed the clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The petition was moot because petitioner had been removed from the United States while the case was pending.
- The court adopted the findings and recommendations in full after conducting de novo review.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 became moot after petitioner was removed from the United States.
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations and terminate the respondent's motion to dismiss.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission, 114 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681-82 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…