Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Timothy Wilkins's motion to proceed in forma pauperis but dismisses his prisoner civil-rights complaint with leave to amend. The court holds that his Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim seeking damages is insufficient because he did not allege a physical injury, and gives him 30 days to file an amended complaint.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a claim for damages because plaintiff alleged no physical injury resulting from the alleged failure to protect.
- The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend because the deficiencies were not shown to be incapable of correction.
- Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint stated an Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against Officer Lugo.
- Whether a prisoner may recover damages for alleged mental or emotional injury from an unmaterialized risk of assault without alleging a physical injury.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed with or without leave to amend.
- Whether plaintiff satisfied the requirements for proceeding in forma pauperis.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (10)
- Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833, 837, 847 (1994)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(followed)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007)(followed)
- Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974)(followed)
- Rodrigues v. Norwood, 2010 WL 2740174, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 9, 2010)(followed)
- Babcock v. White, 102 F.3d 267, 272 (7th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Thompson v. Addison, No. 1:22-CV-01545-HBK (PC), 2024 WL 1053475, at *8 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2024)(followed)
- Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…