Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed Plaintiff David W. Wilson’s action without prejudice because he failed to pay the filing fee after being ordered to do so. The court considered the Ninth Circuit’s factors for terminating sanctions and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Holdings
- A district court may dismiss an action without prejudice when the plaintiff fails to obey an order requiring payment of the filing fee after being warned that noncompliance would result in dismissal.
- The Henderson factors weighed in favor of dismissal because the public interest in expeditious resolution, the Court's need to manage its docket, and the risk of prejudice supported dismissal, while the prior warning satisfied consideration of less drastic sanctions.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee as ordered.
- Whether the Ninth Circuit's factors governing terminating sanctions supported dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261-1262 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 n.2 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…