Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Jake Zhou’s motion for a temporary restraining order challenging the termination of his SEVIS record and F-1 student status. The court found that Zhou was likely to succeed on his Administrative Procedure Act claim and would suffer irreparable harm absent relief. The order enjoined enforcement of the SEVIS termination, waived the bond requirement, and required the defendant to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue.
Holdings
- ICE's termination of Plaintiff's SEVIS record effectively terminated his F-1 status, constituted the consummation of the agency's decision-making process with immediate legal consequences, and was final agency action reviewable under the APA.
- Plaintiff sufficiently demonstrated a likelihood of success because ICE's stated reasons for terminating his SEVIS record—an alleged criminal-record identification and/or visa revocation—were likely not authorized regulatory grounds for terminating his F-1 status and rendered the decision arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion.
- Plaintiff established a likelihood of success, likely irreparable harm, a sufficiently favorable balance of equities, and a public interest supporting preservation of the status quo; the court therefore granted a temporary restraining order.
- The court waived the bond requirement because there was no realistic likelihood of harm to Defendant from the TRO and Plaintiff had demonstrated a likelihood of success.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of success on his APA claim challenging ICE's termination of his SEVIS record and F-1 status.
- Whether Plaintiff demonstrated likely irreparable harm, a favorable balance of equities, and a public interest sufficient to warrant a temporary restraining order.
- Whether the court should waive the bond requirement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (25)
- Aiello v. One West Bank, No. 2:10-cv-0227-GEB-EFB, 2010 WL 406092, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2010)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
- Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997)(followed)
- University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981)(followed)
- GoTo.com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co., 202 F.3d 1199, 1210 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1134-35 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1, 16 (2020)(followed)
- Michigan v. EPA, 576 U.S. 743, 750 (2015)(followed)
- FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 513 (2009)(followed)
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 25.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…