Christopher R. Castillo v. A. Ojeda, et al.

Castillo v. Ojeda · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · January 15, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-00569-CDB (PC)

Summary

The document contains findings and recommendations by a United States magistrate judge in a prisoner civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It recommends dismissal without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to comply with a screening order and failed to prosecute, applying the Ninth Circuit’s dismissal factors.

Holdings

  1. After weighing the applicable five factors, dismissal without prejudice was appropriate because Plaintiff failed to respond to the screening order despite being warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal.
  2. The district court's inherent authority to control its docket permits dismissal as a sanction for failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with the court's screening order.
  2. Whether dismissal without prejudice was appropriate under the five-factor test governing dismissal for failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Thompson v. Hous. Auth., City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-62 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • In re Phenylpropanolamine Prods. Liab. Litig., 460 F.3d 1217, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…