Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal without prejudice of Macey E. Turley, Jr.’s § 1983 action against Elmante. The recommendation is based on the plaintiff’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, comply with a show-cause order, obey court orders and local rules, and prosecute the action. The document provides a 14-day period for objections.
Holdings
- A district court may exercise its inherent docket-control power to impose sanctions, including dismissal, when a party fails to prosecute, obey a court order, or comply with local rules.
- Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because all five relevant factors favored dismissal: expeditious resolution, docket management, prejudice to Defendant, disposition on the merits, and the availability of less drastic sanctions.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action.
- Whether Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's show-cause order, the deadline for responding to Defendant's summary-judgment motion, and applicable local rules warranted dismissal as a sanction.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-62 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…