Macey E. Turley, Jr. v. Elmante

Turley v. Elmante · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · January 8, 2026 · No. 1:23-cv-00596-JLT-CDB (PC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal without prejudice of Macey E. Turley, Jr.’s § 1983 action against Elmante. The recommendation is based on the plaintiff’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, comply with a show-cause order, obey court orders and local rules, and prosecute the action. The document provides a 14-day period for objections.

Holdings

  1. A district court may exercise its inherent docket-control power to impose sanctions, including dismissal, when a party fails to prosecute, obey a court order, or comply with local rules.
  2. Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because all five relevant factors favored dismissal: expeditious resolution, docket management, prejudice to Defendant, disposition on the merits, and the availability of less drastic sanctions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's show-cause order, the deadline for responding to Defendant's summary-judgment motion, and applicable local rules warranted dismissal as a sanction.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (9)

  • Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-62 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…