Sukhjot Singh Sekhon v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Sekhon v. Warden · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · January 9, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-1692-JDP

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Sukhjot Singh Sekhon’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his re-detention by immigration authorities without notice or a hearing. The court held that his prior release from immigration custody created a protected liberty interest in continued release and that due process required notice and a pre-detention hearing before a neutral adjudicator. The court ordered his immediate release and imposed conditions on any future re-detention.

Holdings

  1. A noncitizen released from ICE custody who has lived outside custody under government supervision for an extended period acquires a constitutionally protected liberty interest in continued release.
  2. Before re-detaining a noncitizen who has a protected liberty interest in continued release, the government must provide written notice and an opportunity to be heard before a neutral adjudicator.
  3. Respondents violated Sekhon's Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights by re-detaining him without notice, a hearing, or other adequate procedural safeguards.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a noncitizen who was released from immigration detention and lived outside custody under ICE supervision for more than a year possesses a protected liberty interest in continued release.
  2. Whether the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires notice and a hearing before the government re-detains such a noncitizen.
  3. Whether Sekhon was entitled to habeas relief and immediate release because respondents re-detained him without providing constitutionally adequate procedural safeguards.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (21)

  • Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 374-75 (2000)(followed)
  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973)(followed)
  • I.N.S. v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 301 (2001)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687, 690 (2001)(followed)
  • Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 460 (1989)(followed)
  • Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481-84 (1972)(followed)
  • Gonzalez-Fuentes v. Molina, 607 F.3d 864, 887 (1st Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-3174-DJC-CKD, 2025 WL 3124116, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2025)(followed)
  • Pinchi v. Noem, 792 F. Supp. 3d 1025, 1032-35 (N.D. Cal. 2025)(followed)
  • Rico-Tapia v. Smith, No. 1:25-cv-00379-SASPKJM, 2025 WL 2950089, at *8 (D. Haw. Oct. 10, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…