Summary
The court discharges its order to show cause and recommends dismissing the action without prejudice. It holds that a trust must appear in federal court through licensed counsel and that a non-attorney pro se litigant may not represent the trust. The court concludes that the defect cannot be cured by amendment and gives the parties 21 days to file objections.
Holdings
- A trust must appear in federal court through a licensed attorney, and a non-attorney proceeding pro se may not represent the trust or pursue claims on its behalf.
- The court found no legal authority exempting a purported private ecclesiastical trust from the rule requiring representation by licensed counsel.
- Leave to amend was not appropriate because Negrete, as a non-lawyer, could not cure the defect by bringing claims on behalf of the trust.
Questions Presented
- Whether a trust may appear in federal court through a non-attorney trustee, beneficiary, or representative proceeding pro se.
- Whether a purported private ecclesiastical trust is exempt from the rule requiring representation by licensed counsel.
- Whether the complaint's representation defect could be cured by amendment or required dismissal without prejudice.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697-98 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Alpha Land Co. v. Little, 238 F.R.D. 497, 502 (E.D. Cal. 2006)(followed)
- Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc., 546 F.3d 661, 664, 667 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Coldstream Ministries v. Regions Bank, N.A., No. 2:25-CV-993-KCD-DNF, 2025 WL 3513906, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 8, 2025)(followed)
- Maisano v. Welcher, 940 F.2d 499, 501 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- United States v. Stepard, 876 F. Supp. 214, 215 (D. Ariz. 1994)(followed)
- In re Kilpatrick, No. 25-30619, 2025 WL 3296216, at *22 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Nov. 24, 2025)(not_reached)
- In re Morgan-Grant, No. 24-18665-PDR, 2025 WL 1571024, at *1-3 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. June 3, 2025)(not_reached)
- Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105-06 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…