Summary
This is a court order issued by a United States Magistrate Judge in the Eastern District of California. It orders the parties to show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to file a joint scheduling report as previously required. The order also continues the mandatory scheduling conference and sets a deadline for compliance.
Holdings
- Under Eastern District of California Local Rule 110 and the court's inherent docket-control authority, failure to comply with court rules or orders may warrant sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal; the parties therefore must show cause why sanctions should not issue for failing to file the required joint scheduling report.
Questions Presented
- Whether the parties should be required to show cause why sanctions, including monetary sanctions or dismissal, should not issue for failure to comply with the court's order requiring a joint scheduling report.
- Whether the initial scheduling conference should be continued.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…