Summary
This document is a stipulated protective order in Anthony Eidem v. C. Vang, a federal civil action in the Eastern District of California. It governs the designation, handling, disclosure, challenge, filing, and final disposition of confidential and attorneys’-eyes-only discovery material, particularly information concerning California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation operations and investigations. The court adopted the stipulated order for good cause under Document 48.
Holdings
- The court adopted the parties' stipulated protective order upon finding good cause.
- A protective order does not itself authorize filing documents under seal; a party must comply with Eastern District of California Local Rule 141 and make the showing required for the type of motion to which the documents are attached.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause supported adoption of the parties' stipulated protective order governing confidential and attorneys'-eyes-only discovery material.
- What standards and procedures govern any later request to file material subject to the protective order under seal.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006)(applied)
- Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2010)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…