Brett Rapozo v. County of Sacramento

Summary

This document is a scheduling order in Brett Rapozo v. County of Sacramento, Case No. 2:25-cv-02881-DJC-CKD, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. It establishes deadlines for discovery, expert disclosures, dispositive motions, the final pretrial conference, and trial, and sets procedures for modifying the schedule. The order was signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on December 10, 2025.

Holdings

1. No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings are permitted without leave of court and a showing of good cause.
2. Discovery disputes are referred to the assigned magistrate judge, whose written ruling is final subject to modification by the district judge only upon a showing that the ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
3. The scheduling order becomes final absent timely objections, and it may be modified only by leave of court upon a showing of good cause.

Questions Presented

1. What case-management deadlines and procedures should govern discovery, motions, pretrial proceedings, and trial?
2. Under what circumstances may the parties amend the pleadings, join additional parties, or modify the scheduling order?
3. What procedures govern referral and review of discovery disputes?

Disposition

other