Julie Harcharik v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Harcharik · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · October 7, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-00077-DAD-CSK

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants a modified stipulated protective order in Julie Harcharik v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:25-cv-00077-DAD-CSK. The order governs the designation, disclosure, use, challenge, filing, and final disposition of confidential discovery materials, including medical, tax, financial, employment, and business records. The court clarifies that it will not retain jurisdiction to enforce the protective order after the action is closed.

Holdings

  1. The court approved the parties' stipulated protective order, subject to the stated clarification concerning post-closure jurisdiction.
  2. The court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the protective order once the action is closed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the parties' stipulated protective order should be approved.
  2. Whether the court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the protective order after the action is closed.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012)(followed)
  • Grafilo v. Soorani, 41 Cal. App. 5th 497, 507 (2019)(followed)
  • Schnabel v. Superior Court, 5 Cal. 4th 704, 719-720 (1993)(followed)
  • Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Court, 15 Cal. 3d 652, 656-657 (1975)(followed)
  • Lomeli v. Midland Funding, LLC, 2019 WL 5684531, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…