Director Eric A. Taylor, Regional Director of the Ninth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC

Taylor v. Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Southern Division · May 19, 2026 · No. 6:26-cv-00106-GFVT

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky considers a petition under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act for a temporary injunction against Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC. The petition alleges that Hearthside committed unfair labor practices during and after a union-organizing campaign, including discriminatory discipline and terminations. Applying the four-factor preliminary-injunction test, the court denies the petition because the requirements for equitable relief are not satisfied.

Holdings

  1. A district court evaluating a Section 10(j) petition must apply the four-factor preliminary-injunction test requiring a clear showing of likely success on the merits, likely irreparable harm absent relief, a favorable balance of equities, and that an injunction is in the public interest.
  2. The Regional Director made a clear showing that he was likely to succeed on the merits of the alleged Section 8(a)(1) and Section 8(a)(3) unfair-labor-practice claims.
  3. The Regional Director failed to clearly demonstrate likely irreparable harm absent an injunction.
  4. Because the Regional Director failed to satisfy the irreparable-harm factor, the court denied the petition for a temporary injunction and dismissed the action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Regional Director satisfied the Winter four-factor test for a temporary injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act.
  2. Whether the Regional Director clearly demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm absent interim relief.
  3. Whether the court should deny the petition and dismiss the action when the irreparable-harm requirement was not satisfied.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (20)

  • Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters, 598 U.S. 771 (2023)(followed)
  • Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, 602 U.S. 339 (2024)(followed)
  • Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB, Nos. 24-1973, 24-2102, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4796 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026)(cited)
  • Muffley ex rel. NLRB v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc., 551 F. App'x 825 (6th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008)(followed)
  • McKinney v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC, 857 F.3d 333 (6th Cir. 2017)(limited)
  • Kerwin v. Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital, No. 1:24-cv-445, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194230 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 25, 2024)(cited)
  • Kerwin v. Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital, No. 24-1975, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24733 (6th Cir. Sept. 23, 2025)(cited)
  • Elizabeth K. Kerwin v. Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital, No. 24-1975, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12695 (6th Cir. May 1, 2026)(followed)
  • NLRB v. Transportation Management Corp., 462 U.S. 393 (1983)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…