Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky considered Plaintiff Kari Schweizer’s motion to amend her complaint and remand a removed premises-liability action to state court. The Court permitted joinder of Dollar General Partners but denied joinder of Elite Seal, LLC, concluding that the plaintiff lacked a reasonable basis for recovery against Elite Seal under Kentucky premises-liability law and that joinder would destroy diversity jurisdiction. The Court denied remand and ordered the plaintiff to tender an amended complaint adding Dollar General Partners within fourteen days.
Holdings
- The court denied joinder of Elite Seal because the § 1447(e) factors weighed against amendment. The court considered the purpose of the amendment, the timing of the request, prejudice, and other equitable factors, and treated the existence of a colorable claim against the proposed defendant as relevant to that analysis.
- Schweizer lacked a reasonable basis for recovery against Elite Seal on the allegations and facts presented because Elite Seal performed only a specific repair and did not own, occupy, control, or take entire charge of the parking lot.
- The court held that fraudulent joinder was not technically the governing label for a joinder occurring after removal, but that the existence of a colorable claim against the proposed nondiverse defendant could inform and potentially be dispositive of the § 1447(e) analysis.
- The court granted Schweizer leave to amend to add Dollar General Partners because Rowley did not oppose that joinder.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff should be permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) to join nondiverse Elite Seal, LLC after removal.
- Whether the proposed claim against Elite Seal was colorable under Kentucky premises-liability and negligence law.
- Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to amend the complaint to add nonopposed Dollar General Partners.
- Whether joinder of Elite Seal required remand for lack of complete diversity.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (23)
- Duggins v. Steak 'n Shake, Inc., 195 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962)(followed)
- Cooper v. Thames Healthcare Group, LLC, No. 13-cv-14-GFVT, 2014 WL 941925 (E.D. Ky. Mar. 11, 2014)(followed)
- Premium Fin. Grp., LLC v. MPVF LHE Lexington LLC, No. 5:13-CV-362-KKC, 2014 WL 112308 (E.D. Ky. Jan. 9, 2014)(followed)
- Bridgepointe Condominiums, Inc. v. Integra Bank Nat'l Ass'n, No. 08-475-C, 2009 WL 700056 (W.D. Ky. Mar. 13, 2009)(followed)
- Walters v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse of Georgetown, No. 5:10-cv-302-JMH, 2011 WL 3319717 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 1, 2011)(followed)
- Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc., 186 F.3d 675, 677-78 (5th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Coyne v. Am. Tobacco Co., 183 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Alexander v. Elec. Data Sys. Corp., 13 F.3d 940, 949 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., 577 F.3d 752 (7th Cir. 2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.