Carlos Alberto Lopez-Cruz v. Marc Fields, et al.

Carlos Alberto Lopez-Cruz v. Marc Fields, No. 2:26-cv-00196-DLB (E.D. Ky. May 20, 2026) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky · May 20, 2026 · No. Civil Action No. 26-196-DLB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky granted Carlos Alberto Lopez-Cruz’s habeas petition challenging his immigration detention. The court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225, governs his detention and that his detention without an individualized custody hearing violated due process. The court ordered his immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government must justify continued detention by clear and convincing evidence.

Holdings

  1. Section 1226(a) governed Lopez-Cruz's detention because he was not seeking admission after having entered and lived continuously in the United States and previously having been released into the country.
  2. Lopez-Cruz's detention without access to an individualized hearing violated his Fifth Amendment right to due process.
  3. The proper remedy was immediate release or, alternatively, a constitutionally adequate bond hearing under § 1226(a) at which the government bears the burden of proving dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1225, governed Lopez-Cruz's immigration detention.
  2. Whether detention without access to an individualized bond hearing violated Lopez-Cruz's Fifth Amendment due process rights.
  3. Whether the appropriate remedy was immediate release or a constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which the government bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (18)

  • Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 2026 WL 1283891 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026)(followed)
  • A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 94 (2025)(followed)
  • Trump v. J.G.G., 604 U.S. 670, 673 (2025)(followed)
  • Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 321 (1976)(followed)
  • Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 531 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
  • Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86, 101 (1903)(followed)
  • Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 268 (1970)(followed)
  • Edahi v. Lewis, No. 4:25-cv-129-RGJ, 2025 WL 3466682, at *14 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…