Lona Tracee Whitley, ex rel. S.B. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Whitley · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky · March 30, 2026 · No. 5:24-cv-00365-GFVT

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky partially granted Lona Tracee Whitley’s motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act following remand of her Social Security appeal. The court reduced the requested hours based on substantial copying from a prior brief, excluded unrecoverable pro hac vice and clerical time, and approved attorney and paralegal rates of $245 and $100 per hour, respectively. The court awarded a total of $6,719.00 in EAJA fees.

Holdings

  1. A prevailing private party is entitled to EAJA fees when the statutory requirements are satisfied, including that the government's position was not substantially justified; Whitley was entitled to an EAJA award in this case.
  2. A court may reduce requested EAJA hours that are excessive, redundant, duplicative, inadequately documented, or otherwise unnecessary.
  3. An attorney may receive an EAJA rate above $125 per hour when the applicant provides competent evidence showing both that an increased cost of living or special factor supports the increase and that the requested rate is consistent with prevailing rates in the relevant community.
  4. Paralegal work is compensable under the EAJA only when it reflects tasks traditionally performed by an attorney and customarily billed to a client; purely clerical or secretarial tasks are not compensable at a paralegal rate.
  5. Whitley was entitled to $6,719.00, consisting of 26.2 attorney hours at $245 per hour and 3.0 paralegal hours at $100 per hour.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Whitley was entitled to an award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
  2. Whether the requested attorney and paralegal hours were reasonable in light of substantial duplication from an earlier brief and clerical work.
  3. Whether Whitley provided sufficient evidence to support an attorney hourly rate above the EAJA's $125 statutory cap.
  4. Whether pro hac vice filing expenses and time spent preparing the pro hac vice motion and adjusting timesheets were recoverable under the EAJA.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (23)

  • Comm’r, I.N.S. v. Jean, 496 U.S. 154, 155, 165-66 (1990)(followed)
  • Bryant v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 578 F.3d 443, 445-46, 450 (6th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Minor v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 826 F.3d 878, 881 (6th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Gonter v. Hunt Valve Co., 510 F.3d 610, 616 (6th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433-34, 437 (1983)(followed)
  • English v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:11CV2794, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124085, at *10-11, *24-25 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2012)(followed)
  • Payne v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 13-13561, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116360, at *4-5 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 14, 2015)(followed)
  • Moxley v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:15CV1533, 2016 WL 5922382 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 7, 2016)(followed)
  • Williams v. Dudek, 780 F. Supp. 3d 709, 712 (W.D. Ky. 2025)(followed)
  • Clay v. Berryhill, No. 17-2586-DKV, 2019 WL 12711724, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. July 29, 2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…