Summary
This Report and Recommendation addresses the dismissal of Brian Washington’s pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The recommendation relies on Washington’s failure to pay the filing fee or submit a pauper application, failure to respond to a show-cause order, and failure to update an address that resulted in returned mail.
Holdings
- A court may dismiss a pro se action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when the plaintiff fails to prosecute, fails to comply with procedural requirements, and fails to comply with a court order; on the facts presented, dismissal without prejudice was recommended.
- A pro se litigant's failure to notify the district court of an address change may constitute an additional basis for dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the filing-fee or pauper-application requirement and court orders.
- Whether Washington's failure to notify the court of a current address supplied an additional basis for dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Markwell v. County of Bexar, 878 F.2d 899, 902 (5th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Price v. McGlathery, 792 F.2d 472, 474-75 (5th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Silas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 586 F.2d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Ramsay v. Bailey, 531 F.2d 706, 708-09 (5th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Birl v. Estelle, 660 F.2d 592, 593 (5th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Beard v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc., 214 F. App'x 459, 462 (5th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Kersh v. Derozier, 851 F.2d 1509, 1512 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Lewis v. Hardy, 248 F. App'x 589, 2007 WL 2809969, at *4 n.1 (5th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…