Bradley Joseph Lawrence Savoy v. Caesar’s Entertainment, Inc., et al.

Savoy · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana · April 2, 2026 · No. 2:26-cv-00664

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana grants Bradley Joseph Lawrence Savoy leave to proceed in forma pauperis after finding that he cannot pay the filing fee without undue hardship. The court withholds issuance of summons pending statutory screening and orders Savoy to show cause why his complaint and proposed class allegations should not be summarily dismissed for insufficient factual allegations and his inability, as a pro se litigant, to adequately represent a class.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff established that he was unable to pay the filing fee without undue financial hardship and was financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
  2. Although plaintiff was granted in forma pauperis status, the complaint appeared improper on its face because it lacked sufficient factual allegations to state a claim under Rule 8 and was therefore subject to summary screening under § 1915(e)(2).
  3. A pro se plaintiff proceeding without counsel is inadequate to represent a putative class and may not pursue class claims on behalf of other persons.
  4. Summons would not issue at that time because the statutorily mandated screening under § 1915(e)(2) remained incomplete and plaintiff had been ordered to show cause.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff demonstrated financial eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
  2. Whether the complaint appeared subject to summary dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to contain sufficient factual allegations under Rule 8.
  3. Whether a pro se litigant proceeding without counsel may adequately represent a putative class.
  4. Whether summons should issue before completion of the statutorily mandated in forma pauperis screening and plaintiff’s response to a show-cause order.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (43)

  • Prows v. Kastner, 842 F.2d 138, 140 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Ctr. Mkt., 378 F. App’x 780, 784-85 (10th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Salter v. Johnson, No. 12-738, 2013 WL 550654, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 18, 2013)(followed)
  • Gibbs v. Jackson, 92 F.4th 566, 569 (5th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
  • Startti v. United States, 415 F.2d 1115, 1116 (5th Cir. 1969)(followed)
  • Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Coleman v. Tollefson, 575 U.S. 532 (2015)(cited)
  • Tam Vo v. St. Charles Par., No. 10-4624, 2011 WL 743466, at *1-2 (E.D. La. Feb. 3, 2011)(followed)
  • Amrhein v. United States, 740 F. App’x 65, 66 (5th Cir. 2018)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 43.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…