CASH FLOW RESOURCES, LLC v. HORIZON CONSULTING, INC.

Cash Flow Resources · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana · March 20, 2026 · No. No. 24-2116

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana held Horizon Consulting, Inc. in civil contempt for failing to appear at a judgment debtor examination, a related show-cause hearing, and the contempt hearing. The court imposed a coercive fine of $250 per day, subject to a potential total of $10,000 before consideration of more severe sanctions.

Holdings

  1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(e)(6)(B), the District Court had authority to hear evidence and determine whether Defendant should be held in civil contempt for violating the Magistrate Judge's orders.
  2. A party is in civil contempt when it violates a definite and specific court order requiring particular conduct, with knowledge of the order; the elements are that an order was in effect, the order required specified conduct, and the respondent failed to comply, proven by clear and convincing evidence. Defendant satisfied all three elements and was properly held in civil contempt.
  3. The Court could impose a coercive fine of $250 per day for each day Defendant failed to comply with the order requiring its appearance at a judgment debtor examination, initially allowing the fine to reach $10,000 before considering more severe sanctions upon Plaintiff's motion.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the District Court had authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(e)(6)(B) to conduct a civil-contempt hearing based on a Magistrate Judge's certification and recommendation.
  2. Whether Defendant's failures to appear at the judgment debtor examination and related hearings established civil contempt by clear and convincing evidence.
  3. Whether a coercive fine of $250 per day, capped initially at $10,000 pending consideration of further sanctions, was an appropriate civil-contempt sanction.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Gibson Brands, Inc. v. Armadillo Distribution Enterprises, Inc., No. 19-358, 2023 WL 2352830, at *2 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2023)(followed)
  • Cordova v. Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College Board of Supervisors, No. 19-1027, 2024 WL 263941, at *2 (W.D. La. Jan. 24, 2024)(cited)
  • Piggly Wiggly Clarksville, Inc. v. Mrs. Baird's Bakeries, 177 F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • United States v. Smith, 2018 WL 4524123, at *3 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2018)(cited)
  • Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 370 (1966)(followed)
  • International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821, 831 (1994)(cited)
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Allied Pilots Ass'n, 228 F.3d 574, 585 (5th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 303-04 (1947)(followed)
  • Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. Singh, 428 F.3d 559, 582 (5th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Allstate Settlement Corp. v. Doucette, No. H-15-1130, 2016 WL 3346531, at *3 (S.D. Tex. June 16, 2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…