Summary
A United States magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice of pro se plaintiffs’ claims against Louisiana Governor Jeffrey M. Landry and Secretary of State Nancy Landry concerning state election laws. The report concludes that sovereign immunity, legislative immunity, and failure to state viable claims under the Elections Clause and Guarantee Clause require dismissal. It further recommends allowing plaintiffs 30 days to file an amended complaint.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) because it failed to state a viable claim for relief and sought relief against defendants protected by immunity doctrines.
- The official-capacity claims were barred because plaintiffs failed to allege that either defendant had the requisite connection with enforcement of the challenged laws.
- Legislative immunity barred plaintiffs' claims against Governor Landry based on his signing legislation into law.
- Plaintiffs failed to state a claim under the Elections Clause because they did not identify any conflict between defendants' actions and the Elections Clause.
- Plaintiffs failed to state a justiciable Guarantee Clause claim, and Supreme Court precedent confirms that closed or semi-closed primary systems are constitutionally permissible.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim or because the defendants are immune from the requested relief.
- Whether sovereign immunity barred plaintiffs' official-capacity claims because they failed to allege that the defendants had a sufficient connection with enforcement of the challenged laws.
- Whether legislative immunity barred claims against the Governor based on his signing legislation into law.
- Whether plaintiffs stated a claim under the Elections Clause by alleging that state officials administered laws affecting election fees, nominating signatures, and qualification periods.
- Whether the Guarantee Clause or the Constitution supports claims challenging Louisiana's closed-primary system and signature requirements.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (18)
- Startti v. United States, 415 F.2d 1115, 1116 (5th Cir. 1969)(followed)
- Berry v. Brady, 192 F.3d 504, 507 (5th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Rogers v. Boatright, 709 F.3d 403, 407 (5th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277 (2011)(followed)
- Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 715 (1999)(followed)
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 59 (1996)(followed)
- Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155-57 (1908)(followed)
- Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, 142 S. Ct. 522, 532 (2021)(followed)
- Texas All. for Retired Americans v. Scott, 28 F.4th 669, 671-72, 674 (5th Cir. 2022)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…