Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana denied Plaintiff Lisa Thompson’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s order concerning a motion to compel. Applying the clearly erroneous standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), the court found no error in the determination that the motion was untimely and that a clawback request was proper because the inadvertently produced document was privileged.
Holdings
- The district court found no clear error in the magistrate judge's determination that Plaintiff's motion to compel was untimely and denied the objection.
- The court rejected Plaintiff's argument that Defendant waived its right to assert privilege over the document merely because the document was inadvertently produced.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge clearly erred in determining that Plaintiff's motion to compel was untimely.
- Whether the magistrate judge clearly erred in finding that WESTINGHOUSE 000270 was privileged and that Defendant could properly claw back the inadvertently produced document.
- Whether inadvertent production waived Defendant's right to assert attorney-client or work-product protection over the document.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Castillo v. Frank, 70 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…