Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana grants Quanda Edmond’s unopposed motion to modify the scheduling order and obtain leave to file a third amended complaint. Applying Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 15(a), the court finds good cause to permit the amendment after the scheduling deadline.
Holdings
- When the deadline for amending pleadings has expired, a party must demonstrate good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) before the court applies the more liberal Rule 15(a) standard.
- After finding good cause to modify the scheduling order, the court granted leave under the permissive standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a).
Questions Presented
- Whether the scheduling order should be modified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) to permit amendment after the deadline.
- Whether plaintiff should be granted leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) to file a third amended complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Shaw v. Restoration Hardware, Inc., 93 F.4th 284, 292 (5th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Filgueira v. U.S. Bank Nat Ass'n, 734 F.3d 420, 422 (5th Cir.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…