Richard Neyland, et al. v. Sheriff Susan Hutson, et al.

Neyland · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana · May 20, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-01773

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana partially grants and partially denies Richard Neyland’s motion for attorneys’ fees arising from a partially granted motion to compel discovery. The court reduces the requested fees and awards $2,800.00 for seven hours of work at an hourly rate of $400, with no adjustment under the Johnson factors.

Holdings

  1. Because Defendant did not oppose the fee motion, the requested hourly rate of $400 was deemed prima facie reasonable, although the court expressly declined to determine whether the rate was reasonable within the community.
  2. A fee applicant must adequately document the hours reasonably expended and demonstrate billing judgment; because the 7.82 hours requested were somewhat excessive, the court reduced the award to seven compensable hours.
  3. No adjustment to the lodestar was warranted under the Johnson factors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff established entitlement to reasonable attorneys’ fees under the lodestar method after partially prevailing on a motion to compel discovery.
  2. Whether the requested hourly rate and hours were reasonable and supported by adequate documentation and billing judgment.
  3. Whether the Johnson factors warranted an adjustment to the lodestar.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (18)

  • Watkins v. Fordice, 7 F.3d 453, 457, 459 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433-34 (1983)(followed)
  • Saizan v. Delta Concrete Products Co., 448 F.3d 795, 799 (5th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Tollett v. City of Kemah, 285 F.3d 357, 368 (5th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • La. Power & Light Co. v. Kellstrom, 50 F.3d 319, 324, 328-29 (5th Cir. 1995) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir. 1974)(followed)
  • Heidtman v. County of El Paso, 171 F.3d 1038, 1043 (5th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Village Shopping Center Partnership v. Kimble Development LLC, 287 So. 3d 882, 886 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • St. Blanc v. Stabile, 114 So. 3d 1158, 1160 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Black v. SettlePou, P.C., 732 F.3d 492, 502 (5th Cir. 2013)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…