Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana grants Defendant’s ex parte motion for leave to file an amended answer. The amendment would add a “same decision” defense to a mixed-motive employment-discrimination theory, and the court finds that allowing it would cause no prejudice and promote judicial efficiency.
Holdings
- Leave to amend was warranted because the proposed amendment conformed the pleadings to the mixed-motive issue being tried, would not prejudice Plaintiff, and would promote judicial efficiency.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant should be granted leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(b) to amend its answer to plead a same-decision defense to a mixed-motive theory.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Simi Inv. Co. v. Harris Ctny., Tex., 236 F.3d 240, 252 n.16 (5th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Deere & Co. v. Johnson, 271 F.3d 613, 621 (5th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Adams v. 'l Hermann, 973 F.3d 3438, 354 (5th Cir. 2020)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…