Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted Nautilus Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment in a declaratory-judgment action concerning coverage for injuries sustained during soccer tryouts at Tri-City Sports Complex. The court held that the policy’s Participants Exclusion applied because Hallie Beck was a participant in a covered event and was injured within the defined activity area. The court declared that Nautilus had no duty to defend or indemnify Tri-City in the underlying negligence action and denied all pending motions in limine as moot.
Holdings
- The Participants Exclusion unambiguously applied and negated coverage for Hallie Beck's injury because she was a participant in a covered event and her injury occurred in the defined activity area.
- The soccer tryouts were an 'event' under the policy because Tri-City managed them within the ordinary meaning of that term.
- Hallie's injury occurred in the policy-defined activity area because the walkway adjacent to the playing field was specifically set aside for the soccer tryouts and was within Tri-City's control.
- Nautilus had no duty to indemnify Tri-City for Beck's underlying negligence claim because the Participants Exclusion barred coverage.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Participants Exclusion in Tri-City's policy applied to Hallie Beck's injury and barred Nautilus's duty to defend.
- Whether the soccer tryouts constituted an insured-policy 'event' because Tri-City managed, operated, or sponsored them.
- Whether Hallie's injury occurred in the policy-defined 'activity area.'
- Whether Nautilus was entitled to a declaration that it had no duty to indemnify Tri-City.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (24)
- DeVooght v. City of Warren, 157 F.4th 893, 899-900 (6th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)(followed)
- Miller v. Maddox, 866 F.3d 386, 389 (6th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 252, 255 (1986)(followed)
- Finley v. Huss, 102 F.4th 789, 804 (6th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Am. Bumper & Mfg. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 550 N.W.2d 475, 480-81 & n.12 (Mich. 1996)(followed)
- Safety Specialty Ins. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 53 F.4th 1016, 1021, 1024 (6th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Martin, 773 N.W.2d 29, 43 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009)(followed)
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co., 301 N.W.2d 832, 835 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981)(followed)
- N. Bank v. Cincinnati Ins. Companies, 125 F.3d 983, 986 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.