Cary Cosgrove v. Rasco, et al.

Case No. 25-11159 · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division · March 3, 2026 · No. 25-11159

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denies Cary Cosgrove’s motion seeking to require jail staff to sign logs for all incoming and outgoing mail. The court concludes that the motion is based on allegations already presented in the complaint, cites no supporting authority, and does not identify a clear procedural mechanism for the requested relief. The order states that the underlying issues will be litigated in due course.

Holdings

  1. The motion was denied because plaintiff cited no authority supporting the requested mail-log requirement, failed to identify a clear procedural mechanism for obtaining the relief, and raised issues that would be litigated through the complaint.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff's Motion for Order should be granted when it cited no legal authority, did not identify a clear procedural mechanism for the requested relief, and substantially repeated allegations already presented in the complaint.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App'x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Rogers v. Detroit Police Dep't, 595 F. Supp. 2d 757, 766 (E.D. Mich. 2009)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…