Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denied Kareem Shaw’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that the Bureau of Prisons properly aggregated Shaw’s consecutive sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 3584(c) and correctly determined that his conviction for escape under 18 U.S.C. § 751(a) made him ineligible for First Step Act time credits.
Holdings
- The BOP properly aggregated Shaw's consecutive escape sentence with his drug-conspiracy sentence for administrative purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3584(c), including for determining eligibility for First Step Act time credits.
- Shaw was ineligible for First Step Act earned time credits because his aggregated sentence included a conviction for escape under 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), a disqualifying offense under 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(D)(xiv).
Questions Presented
- Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3584(c) required the BOP to treat Shaw's consecutive sentences from separate criminal cases as a single aggregate term for administrative purposes.
- Whether the aggregated sentence rendered Shaw ineligible for First Step Act earned time credits under 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(D), because one of the convictions was for escape under 18 U.S.C. § 751(a).
Disposition
denied
Cases Cited (8)
- United States v. Shaw, Case No. 13-cr-00025, Doc. 670 (W.D. Va.)(background)
- United States v. Shaw, Case No. 22-cr-00105, Doc. 29 (E.D. Va.)(background)
- Keeling v. Lemaster, 2023 WL 9061914, at *1 (6th Cir. Nov. 22, 2023)(followed)
- Sok v. Eischen, 2022 WL 17156797, at *5 (D. Minn. Oct. 26, 2022)(relied upon)
- Hargrove v. Healy, 2024 WL 3992261, at *4-5 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 28, 2024)(followed)
- Andrews v. Rardin, 2024 WL 3236249, at *3 (E.D. Mich. June 28, 2024)(followed)
- Martinez v. Rosalez, No. 23-50406, 2024 WL 140438, at *3 (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 2024)(followed)
- Witham v. United States, 355 F.3d 501, 504 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…