Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan adopts the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation after no party filed objections. The court denies the defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint without prejudice, following the parties’ agreement that plaintiff would file a Second Amended Complaint.
Holdings
- Because no party filed objections, the district court was released from its duty to independently review the report and recommendation and could adopt its recommended disposition.
- The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommended disposition and denied Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint without prejudice.
- Failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when no party filed objections.
- Whether Defendants' pending motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint should be denied without prejudice in light of the parties' agreement that Plaintiff would file a Second Amended Complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)(applied)
- Ivey v. Wilson, 832 F.2d 950 (6th Cir. 1987)(applied)
- Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991)(applied)
- Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…