Patricia A. Oliver v. AmeriHealth Caritas Services, LLC and Blue Cross Complete of Michigan, LLC

Oliver · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division · March 12, 2026 · No. 23-13071

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Patricia Oliver’s Title VII race-discrimination and retaliation action. The court held that Oliver’s untimely responses to requests for admission were admitted by operation of law and that those admissions, along with the evidentiary record, precluded her claims.

Holdings

  1. Requests for admission are self-executing: matters not answered or objected to within the mandatory response period are admitted by operation of law.
  2. Admissions that became effective under Rule 36 cannot be overcome at summary judgment by contradictory affidavit testimony or other evidence, and unsupported attorney argument does not create a genuine dispute of material fact.
  3. Summary judgment was warranted on Oliver's Title VII race-discrimination claim because her admissions established that she had no facts showing race played a role in disciplinary or termination decisions, and she offered no supported evidence creating a genuine dispute or showing pretext.
  4. Summary judgment was warranted on Oliver's Title VII retaliation claims because her admissions established that she had no facts or knowledge connecting her governmental or internal complaints to the termination or any disciplinary decision, and she offered no supported evidence of pretext.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 on Oliver's Title VII race-discrimination claim.
  2. Whether Oliver's untimely responses to requests for admission were deemed admitted by operation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(3).
  3. Whether Oliver could avoid the effect of the admissions without moving under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(b) to withdraw or amend them.
  4. Whether defendants were entitled to summary judgment on Oliver's Title VII retaliation claims.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Mutchler v. Dunlap Mem'l Hosp., 485 F.3d 854, 857 (6th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247–48 (1986)(followed)
  • Bethel v. Jenkins, 988 F.3d 931, 938 (6th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 330 n.3 (1986)(followed)
  • Goodson v. Brennan, 688 F. App'x 372, 375–77 (6th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 560 F. App'x 233, 244 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Locke v. City of Cookeville, 77 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605–06 (6th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Newman v. Fed. Express Corp., 266 F.3d 401, 406 (6th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Laughlin v. City of Cleveland, 633 F. App'x 312, 315 (6th Cir. 2015)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…