Summary
The court addressed Plaintiff William L. Platz, Jr.'s motion for leave to amend his pro se civil rights complaint. Because Defendant had not served a responsive pleading or Rule 12(b) motion and the amendment was within the applicable period, the court terminated the motion as moot and accepted the amended complaint.
Holdings
- Plaintiff did not need leave to amend because he was entitled to amend his complaint once as a matter of course under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), before service of an answer or Rule 12(b) motion.
- The motion for leave to amend was terminated as moot, and Plaintiff's amended complaint was accepted.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff required leave of court to amend his complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a).
- Whether Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend should be terminated as moot and the proposed amended complaint accepted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 233 F.3d 417, 421 (6th Cir. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…