Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan dismissed Ruth Amo’s pro se habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 without prejudice after she failed to pay the filing fee or correct an incomplete in forma pauperis application as ordered. The court closed the case, denied a certificate of appealability, and stated that any new habeas action would require filing a new case with the fee or a completed in forma pauperis application.
Holdings
- A federal district court may sua sponte dismiss a habeas action without prejudice when the petitioner fails to pay the filing fee or cure an incomplete in forma pauperis application after being ordered to do so.
- A certificate of appealability should not issue because reasonable jurists would not debate the correctness of the court's procedural dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court could dismiss the habeas petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's deficiency order.
- Whether a certificate of appealability should issue from the procedural dismissal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Mulbah v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., 261 F.3d 586, 589 (6th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962)(followed)
- Gravitt v. Tyszkiewicz, 14 F. App'x 348, 349 (6th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Smith v. Michigan Dep't of Corr., No. 14-14790, 2015 WL 4620605, at *1-2 (E.D. Mich. July 31, 2015)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-485 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…