Summary
The court grants defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff Corey Chrivia’s sur-reply to their motion for summary judgment. The court concludes that Chrivia neither sought leave to file the sur-reply nor showed good cause, and orders the sur-reply stricken.
Holdings
- A non-moving party has no right to file a sur-reply; a party seeking to file one must obtain leave of court and demonstrate good cause.
- The defendants' motion to strike was granted, and the plaintiff's sur-reply was stricken.
Questions Presented
- Whether the plaintiff's sur-reply should be stricken when he filed it without leave, failed to show good cause, and did not address new arguments or evidence in the opposing party's reply.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Flowers, 513 F.3d 546, 553 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat'l Democratic Party of the USA, Inc., 875 F. Supp. 2d 791, 797 (W.D. Tenn. 2012)(followed)
- NCMIC Ins. Co. v. Smith, 375 F. Supp. 3d 831, 835 (S.D. Ohio 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…