Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan adopts a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in a Social Security case. The court grants the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies the Commissioner’s motion, and remands the matter for further consideration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Holdings
- Because neither party filed objections within the prescribed fourteen-day period, the parties forfeited their right to appeal the magistrate judge's findings.
- The district court may adopt an unobjected-to report and recommendation after reviewing it for clear error, and the court adopted the report in full because it found no clear error.
- Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was granted, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment was denied, and the matter was remanded for further consideration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when neither party filed objections.
- Whether plaintiff's motion for summary judgment should be granted, defendant's motion for summary judgment denied, and the Social Security matter remanded under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (3)
- Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)(followed)
- Roby v. Bloom Roofing Sys., 343 F.R.D. 487, 490 (E.D. Mich. 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…