Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan overruled Derek Brown’s objection to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, adopted the recommendation, and granted Newrez LLC’s motion to dismiss. The court dismissed Brown’s Fair Debt Collection Practices Act complaint, finding that his one-sentence objection did not identify a specific error and that the Report and Recommendation contained no clear error.
Holdings
- An objection must specifically identify the challenged finding or determination and explain how the magistrate judge's analysis was erroneous; a general objection that does not do so is not entitled to de novo review.
- The court found no clear error in the report and recommendation, adopted it, granted Newrez's Rule 12(b)(6) motion, and dismissed Brown's complaint.
Questions Presented
- Whether Brown's one-sentence objection adequately identified a specific error in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation so as to require de novo review.
- Whether the report and recommendation should be adopted and Brown's complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 151 (1985)(followed)
- Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208, 1215 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Lardie v. Birkett, 221 F. Supp. 2d 806, 807 (E.D. Mich. 2002)(followed)
- Mira v. Marshall, 806 F.2d 636, 637 (6th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Miller v. Currie, 50 F.3d 373, 380 (6th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Howard v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 932 F.2d 505, 509 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Verdone v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2018 WL 1516918, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2018)(followed)
- Ramirez v. United States, 898 F. Supp. 2d 659, 663 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)(followed)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dolgencorp, LLC, 277 F. Supp. 3d 932, 965 (E.D. Tenn. 2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…