Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in a Social Security appeal. The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, affirmed the administrative law judge’s decision, and closed the case.
Holdings
- A party that fails to file timely objections forfeits the right to appeal the magistrate judge's findings; the district court may review the unobjected-to report for prejudicial clear error.
- The report and recommendation should be adopted because no party objected and the court found no prejudicial clear error.
- Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied, Defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted, and the ALJ's decision was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when no party filed objections.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment overturning the Social Security administrative law judge's decision.
- Whether the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment should be granted and the ALJ's decision affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…