Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan grants Dwight Lemar Young’s motion to lift the stay and amend his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court orders the case reopened, amends the caption to identify Donald Curley as respondent, directs service of the amended petition, and requires a supplemental answer and additional Rule 5 materials.
Holdings
- A federal court may reinstate a stayed habeas petition upon a timely request after the petitioner completes exhaustion of the relevant state-court remedies; because Young represented that his state post-conviction appeal was finalized and his claims were exhausted, the court reopened the original petition.
- The court granted Young leave to amend his habeas petition because the proposed amended petition advanced new claims that might have arguable merit.
- The caption was properly amended to identify Donald Curley, the warden of the facility where Young was incarcerated, as the respondent.
- The clerk was directed to serve the amended petition and order on respondent and the Michigan Attorney General, and respondent was directed to file a supplemental answer and any additional Rule 5 materials within 120 days.
Questions Presented
- Whether the stayed § 2254 habeas case should be reopened after petitioner represented that the state post-conviction proceedings and exhaustion of his claims were complete.
- Whether petitioner should be permitted to amend the habeas petition to assert new claims with arguable merit.
- Whether the case caption should be amended to identify Donald Curley, the current warden, as the proper respondent.
- Whether respondent should be ordered to serve a supplemental answer and additional Rule 5 materials concerning the amended petition.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Rodriguez v. Jones, 625 F. Supp. 2d 552, 559 (E.D. Mich. 2009)(followed)
- Edwards Johns, 450 F. Supp. 2d 755, 757 (E.D. Mich. 2006)(followed)
- Braden v. United States, 817 F.3d 926, 930 (6th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Coffee v. Harry, No. 04-71209-DT, 2005 WL 1861943, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2005)(followed)
- Erwin v. Elo, 130 F. Supp. 2d 887, 891 (E.D. Mich. 2001)(followed)
- Griffin v. Rogers, 308 F.3d 647, 653–54 (6th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…