Ilham M. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Ilham M. · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · January 26, 2026 · No. 24-13301

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan reviewed an administrative decision concerning an alleged Supplemental Security Income overpayment. The court held that substantial evidence supported the finding that the plaintiff received $3,000 in gambling winnings, was overpaid $368.23, and was not without fault because she failed to timely report the income. The court granted the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, denied the plaintiff’s motions, and affirmed the ALJ’s decision.

Holdings

  1. Substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that the $3,000 lottery winnings were Plaintiff's countable unearned income in August 2021 and that the $368.23 SSI payment for that month therefore constituted an overpayment.
  2. Substantial evidence supported the ALJ's finding that Plaintiff was at fault because she knew or should have known that she was required to report the gambling winnings and failed to do so timely.
  3. Waiver was unavailable because Plaintiff failed to establish that she was without fault in causing the overpayment.
  4. The court could deem Plaintiff's arguments waived because her filings did not present developed arguments challenging the ALJ's fault determination, but the court alternatively reached the merits and affirmed the ALJ's decision.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that Plaintiff received $3,000 in countable unearned income from lottery winnings in August 2021, causing a $368.23 SSI overpayment.
  2. Whether substantial evidence supported the ALJ's determination that Plaintiff was at fault for the overpayment because she failed to timely report the gambling winnings.
  3. Whether Plaintiff's overpayment could be waived under the Social Security Act and applicable regulations.
  4. Whether Plaintiff waived judicial-review arguments by failing to present developed arguments concerning the ALJ's fault determination.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Longworth v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 402 F.3d 591, 595 (6th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019)(followed)
  • Bass v. McMahon, 499 F.3d 506, 512-13 (6th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Wyatt v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 974 F.2d 680, 683 (6th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Heston v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 245 F.3d 528, 535 (6th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Walker v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 884 F.2d 241, 245 (6th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Kornecky v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 167 F. App'x 496, 508 (6th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Cutlip v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 25 F.3d 284, 286 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Cohan v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 802 F. App'x 886, 892 (6th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Jenkins v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 23-1036, 2023 WL 9231492, at *2 (6th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…