Rollins v. Rardin

Rollins · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · January 12, 2026 · No. 2:25-cv-11849

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan dismissed Adam James Rollins’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition as moot. The court concluded that Rollins’s release from federal custody to residential reentry or home confinement eliminated any live case or controversy concerning his requested relief.

Holdings

  1. The petition was moot because Rollins had been released to a Residential Reentry Center or home confinement, leaving no further relief that the court could grant on his habeas claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Rollins's § 2241 habeas petition became moot after he was released from Bureau of Prisons custody and the court could no longer grant the requested placement relief.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (7)

  • United States v. Juvenile Male, 564 U.S. 932, 936 (2011)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990)(followed)
  • Preiser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 401 (1975)(followed)
  • Ailor v. City of Maynardville, 368 F.3d 587, 596 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Deakins v. Monaghan, 484 U.S. 193, 199 (1988)(followed)
  • Thomas Sysco Food Svs. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 60, 62 (6th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Picron-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…