Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denied Lisa Sharon Burchfield’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. The court held that her allegations of past police harassment, ticketing, and assault did not establish a likelihood of success or an immediate, non-speculative threat of irreparable harm, and noted limits on relief affecting municipal proceedings or judicial officers.
Holdings
- Burchfield was not entitled to emergency injunctive relief because she failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or an immediate threat of irreparable harm.
- To the extent Burchfield sought to enjoin an upcoming municipal proceeding or obtain injunctive relief against a judicial officer acting in a judicial capacity, that relief was unavailable under governing law absent the circumstances required for an exception to abstention.
Questions Presented
- Whether Burchfield demonstrated entitlement to a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.
- Whether allegations concerning past events established an immediate, non-speculative threat of future irreparable harm.
- Whether the requested injunction was unavailable insofar as it sought to interfere with an ongoing municipal proceeding or enjoin a judicial officer acting in a judicial capacity.
Disposition
denied
Cases Cited (5)
- Gen. Motors Corp. v. Harry Brown’s, LLC, 563 F.3d 312, 318–19 (8th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc)(followed)
- H&R Block, Inc. v. Block, Inc., 58 F.4th 939, 951 (8th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Night Clubs, Inc. v. City of Fort Smith, 163 F.3d 475, 479–81 (8th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…