Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri dismissed Sidney Keys’s pro se complaint against Hertz Rental without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court held that the complaint failed to plausibly allege discriminatory intent supporting a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The court granted leave to proceed without prepaying fees or costs and denied the motion to appoint counsel.
Holdings
- The complaint failed to state a plausible § 1981 claim because Plaintiff alleged no facts from which the court could infer that Hertz acted with discriminatory intent or racial animus.
- The court was required to dismiss the action without prejudice because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint plausibly alleged racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.
- Whether the complaint was subject to dismissal on initial review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
- Whether Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel should be granted.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (11)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
- Barton v. Taber, 820 F.3d 958, 964 (8th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Brown v. Green Tree Servicing LLC, 820 F.3d 371, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972)(followed)
- Solomon v. Petray, 795 F.3d 777, 787 (8th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Martin v. Aubuchon, 623 F.2d 1282, 1286 (8th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993)(followed)
- Young v. Robert Half Int'l, Inc., 79 F.4th 949, 962 (8th Cir. 2023)(followed)
- Keys v. Marriott Int'l Corp., No. 4:25-cv-339-SEP (E.D. Mo.)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…